作者 主题: 【求教】轰鸣一击对不受重击伤害的对手是否有用(3R崇善书)  (阅读 1347 次)

副标题:

离线 Antbwk

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • 帖子数: 56
  • 苹果币: 0
这边是我在果园找到的译文
轰鸣一击(Resounding Blow)[通用]
你强大的攻击令面对你的敌人恐惧颤抖。
先决条件:力量13,猛力攻击,威吓7级
效果:当你用一件你所擅长的近战武器打出重击时,你的对手必须通过一个意志检定(DC=10+1/2你的人物等级+魅力调整值),否则将畏缩(cower)一轮。武僧的徒手打击在运用此专长时视为近战武器。
特殊:战士可以选择轰鸣一击作为战士奖励专长。
shipiaozi忧心忡忡地跟我说:“现在从3r到4E、从4R到5E,甚至还有果园的很多地方,一个歧视shipiaozi、迫害shipiaozi、虐待shipiaozi的事实联盟已经形成。人们不应该因为自己的理论就受到嘲讽,必须让世界上更多有知的人们伸出正义之手,支持清晰正确的shipiaozi理论……”
 “等等,”我说,“他们都怎么嘲讽你了?”
“他们既不肯同意我的观点,又不肯不提实战!”shipiaozi一脸悲愤地说。

lesser

  • 访客
无效

离线 ddike

  • Guard
  • **
  • 帖子数: 239
  • 苹果币: 0
我倾向于有效,类比焰爆武器的效果。

lesser

  • 访客
引用
The flaming burst, icy burst, and shocking burst weapon powers require a critical hit to trigger the burst. What happens when you attack a foe that isn’t subject to critical hits? What happens if your critical hit is negated by fortification?
In either case, the burst effect doesn’t occur.
If an effect is negated, it is invalidated, prevented, or ended with respect to a designated area or target. That’s true whether the negation is automatic (such as from immunity) or contingent upon a roll or check (fortification).
If another effect is contingent on the success of a root effect (like, say, any of the burst weapons in the DMG, which are triggered on a successful critical hit), and the root effect is negated, the contingent effect is also negated. In the case of these burst weapons, if the critical hit is negated so is the burst
weapon’s critical-dependant effect, since it is triggered on a “successful critical hit” (DMG 224 Flaming Burst entry and DMG 225 Icy Burst and Shocking Burst entries).
There are exceptions to this rule, but they are called out specifically in the effect’s description. For example, some weapon properties in the MIC state “this effect activates even if the target is not normally vulnerable [or subject to] to extra damage from critical hits.” In these cases you would roll to
confirm a critical hit, and with a successful critical confirmation you would apply the damage or effect for the special effect, though you would not add the extra weapon damage for the critical hit.
Here’s an example of how this works: If a fighter with an 18 Strength with a +1 desiccating burst greatsword (MIC 32) rolled a natural 19 on an attack against a water elemental (and hit the elemental), you would roll to confirm the critical, even though water elementals are immune to critical hits. On a
confirmed critical, the weapon does 2d6+7 plus 3d8 points of damage from the desiccating property to the water elemental.
Note: This FAQ entry is a correction of an older FAQ entry that allowed all of these types of weapons to burst even if the target was immune to critical hits or the critical hit was negated in some other way.
faq

ls点的焰爆

离线 ddike

  • Guard
  • **
  • 帖子数: 239
  • 苹果币: 0
又吃书……

* ddike 殴打了卫生纸

离线 Antbwk

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • 帖子数: 56
  • 苹果币: 0
感谢
shipiaozi忧心忡忡地跟我说:“现在从3r到4E、从4R到5E,甚至还有果园的很多地方,一个歧视shipiaozi、迫害shipiaozi、虐待shipiaozi的事实联盟已经形成。人们不应该因为自己的理论就受到嘲讽,必须让世界上更多有知的人们伸出正义之手,支持清晰正确的shipiaozi理论……”
 “等等,”我说,“他们都怎么嘲讽你了?”
“他们既不肯同意我的观点,又不肯不提实战!”shipiaozi一脸悲愤地说。